DEPARTMENT OF THt NAVY
mrvaafier crys oma ss) wi f VE Bp AF we Ort ~
BOARD FOR CORRE UTI WP Nesvrie Pert whee
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
TAL
Docket No: 3065-14
5 November 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the
Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute
of limitations and consider your application on its merits. A
three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
22 October 2014. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error
and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
red by the Board consisted
11 Lal submitted 1
cable statutes,
=]
Oo:
Board. Documentary material conside
of your application, together with al
acer
support thereof, your navat record, and appli
regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
16 February 1992. You served for a year and seven months
without disciplinary incident, but on 30 September 1993, you
received nonjudicial punishment (NUP) for one day of
unauthorized absence from your unit and wrongful possession of
marijuana.
Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative
separation by reason misconduct due to drug abuse at which time
you waived your procedural rights to consult with legal counsel
ive Gischarage board.
reat
atte ~
and to present your case to an admin
Your commanding officer recommende ischarge under other than
honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
The discharge authority approved this recommendation and
directed separation under other than honorable conditions by
reason of misconduct, and on 8 November 1993, you were so
nm Gy bk
At awAbkas-
distharged
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your desire to upgrade your discharge and assertions that you
used marijuana to help with your post-traumatic stress disorder
(PTSD) and alcoholism. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these
factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of
your discharge given the seriousness of your misconduct.
Further, you were given an opportunity to defend your actions,
but waived your procedural rights. Regarding your assertion of
suffering from PTSD, the Board noted that you did not provide a
diagnosis and that the severity of misconduct outweighed the
mitigation of your possible diagnosis. Accordingly, your
application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s
decision. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by
the Board prior to making its decision in your case. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a pr sumption of
regularity attaches to all official records Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
a
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or LATUSti6e.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3065 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 October 2014. The discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, and on 8 November 1993, you were so dischargea ‘The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, ‘carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to upgrade your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR3065 15_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 October 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, and on 8 November...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2777 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your record of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR621 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5226 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5226 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR621 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015 . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and pclicies. After applying these guidelines to the evidence in the case, the Board was not able to substantiate the existence o= PTSD in your case .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3128 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure, at which time you waived your procedural rights to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board. Nevertheless, the Board found that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3128 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative ‘separation by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure, at which time you waived your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6863 14_Redacted
A three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2015. On 17 July 1985, you were notified of administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse at which time you waived your procedural rights. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.